🌎 Issue
United States, trade and migration: what each party thinks
By Fadrique Garcia Font ·
Tariffs on China and countries without a trade agreement, whether to prioritize North America or Latin America, and stopping migrants heading to the United States.
3 questions, 24 party positions and 1 complete disagreement (how they are assigned).
Further reading on this topic: «Mexico’s parties and the United States: USMCA, tariffs, migration».
What divides the parties on this issue
The December 2025 tariff vote captures this theme well. Raising duties on more than 1,400 Chinese goods and imports from other economies lacking a trade deal with Mexico was backed by Morena and the PVEM, while the PT abstained, as did the PAN and the PRI; Movimiento Ciudadano was the only bench opposed. The positions follow from that: Morena and the PVEM strongly agree with keeping those tariffs; the PAN and the PRI land in the middle; the PT disagrees, its floor leader having warned of more inflation and deeper dependence on the United States; Movimiento Ciudadano strongly disagrees, in the name of free trade. Each bloc splits along a different seam.
The PT again breaks from its own side on where Mexico should look. Its platform proposes a Latin American and Caribbean bloc that does not depend on Washington, so it disagrees with putting North American partners first. On the other side, the PAN and the PRI put it in writing: the first pledges to prioritize its two northern neighbors, and the second calls that partnership a national priority, even while defining Mexico as a Latin American country. Morena, Movimiento Ciudadano and SOMOS sit in the middle, each with its own blend: North American ties described as strategic alongside continental integration, main allies in the north with more links elsewhere, or a relationship with the United States deemed fundamental next to a program that looks to Latin America, Asia, Europe and Africa.
On migration, no party with a source argues for stopping people from crossing toward the north. Movimiento Ciudadano holds the opposite extreme: it proposes free transit through the country and calls military containment inhumane. The PAN, the PT and SOMOS also disagree, by different routes: respect for human mobility with order at the border, the view that migration cannot be stopped, or the denial that illegal migration even exists. The PRI sits in the middle, between protecting migrants and tightening border security.
What is missing is the governing bloc's paper trail on that last question: Morena and the PVEM appear in the middle only by estimate, and so does PAZ. Seven positions out of 24 here rest on estimates, and PAZ, which will not file a platform until January 2027, has none documented.
Written from the documented positions of the eight parties on the questions in this issue; where part of it rests on estimated positions, that is stated. It does not include the answers of people taking the test.
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their electoral platforms, founding documents, votes in the Chamber of Deputies and public statements. The numbers refer to the questions below, each with its details and sources.
1. Mexico should keep high tariffs on products from China and other countries that have no trade agreement with it.
Since January 1, 2026, more than 1,400 products from countries with no trade agreement with Mexico, such as China, have paid tariffs of between 5% and 50%. The Chamber approved the increase in December 2025.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favor, 3 in between and 3 against.
-
PAN In betweenVotación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 9 de diciembre de 2025 (Ley de los Impuestos Generales de Importación y de Exportación) Why
-
PRI In betweenVotación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 9 de diciembre de 2025 (Ley de los Impuestos Generales de Importación y de Exportación) Why
-
PVEM Strongly in favorVotación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 9 de diciembre de 2025 (Ley de los Impuestos Generales de Importación y de Exportación) Why
-
PT AgainstVotación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 9 de diciembre de 2025 (Ley de los Impuestos Generales de Importación y de Exportación); Bloomberg Línea, 10 de diciembre de 2025 Why
-
MC Strongly againstVotación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 9 de diciembre de 2025 (Ley de los Impuestos Generales de Importación y de Exportación) Why
-
Morena Strongly in favorVotación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 9 de diciembre de 2025 (Ley de los Impuestos Generales de Importación y de Exportación) Why
-
PAZ In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why
2. Mexico should prioritize its relationship with the United States and Canada over its relationship with Latin America.
The United States is by far Mexico's main trading partner, and the USMCA links the three North American countries. Mexico is also a member of CELAC, with the rest of Latin America and the Caribbean.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favor, 5 in between and 1 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | In favor | Plataforma electoral 2024, p. 198 Why |
| PRI | In favor | Declaración de principios (2024), p. 23 Why |
| PVEM | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PT | Against | Plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 57-58 Why |
| MC | In between | Plataforma electoral 2024, p. 62 Why |
| Morena | In between | Plataforma electoral 2024, p. 41; programa de acción (2024), p. 3 Why |
| PAZ | In between | Estimated position Why |
| SOMOS | In between | Programa de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 74 Why |
-
PAN In favorPlataforma electoral 2024, p. 198 Why
-
PRI In favorDeclaración de principios (2024), p. 23 Why
-
PVEM In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PT AgainstPlataforma electoral 2024, pp. 57-58 Why
-
MC In betweenPlataforma electoral 2024, p. 62 Why
-
Morena In betweenPlataforma electoral 2024, p. 41; programa de acción (2024), p. 3 Why
-
PAZ In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS In betweenPrograma de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 74 Why
3. Mexico should stop undocumented migrants from crossing the country on their way to the United States.
Mexico is a transit country for migrants from Central America, the Caribbean, South America and other regions trying to reach the United States. A new Mobility and Migration Law is pending in the Chamber.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 0 in favor, 4 in between and 4 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | Against | Plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 190-191 Why |
| PRI | In between | Declaración de principios (2024), p. 23 Why |
| PVEM | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PT | Against | Programa de acción (2023), p. 8; plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 57-58 Why |
| MC | Strongly against | Programa de acción (2025), p. 12 Why |
| Morena | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PAZ | In between | Estimated position Why |
| SOMOS | Against | Programa de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), pp. 15 y 75 Why |
-
PAN AgainstPlataforma electoral 2024, pp. 190-191 Why
-
PRI In betweenDeclaración de principios (2024), p. 23 Why
-
PVEM In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PT AgainstPrograma de acción (2023), p. 8; plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 57-58 Why
-
MC Strongly againstPrograma de acción (2025), p. 12 Why
-
Morena In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PAZ In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS AgainstPrograma de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), pp. 15 y 75 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 1 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test