📜 Issue
Rights and freedoms: what each party thinks
By Fadrique Garcia Font ·
Abortion in the first 12 weeks, adoption by same-sex couples, cannabis, legal name and gender changes for trans people, euthanasia and takedowns of online content.
6 questions, 48 party positions and 1 complete disagreement (how they are assigned).
Further reading on this topic: «Mexico’s parties and rights: abortion, adoption and marijuana».
What divides the parties on this issue
On matters of conscience, the Chamber's opposition stops being a bloc. The PAN and Movimiento Ciudadano both have sources on four of this theme's six questions, and on three of them they sit on opposite sides: abortion, marijuana and euthanasia. The PAN's program rejects abortion and euthanasia in the name of life from conception to natural death, and opposes legalizing drugs, though it respects medical cannabis. Movimiento Ciudadano wants the public health system to guarantee pregnancy termination, to regulate cannabis for adult use as well, and to legalize euthanasia, as its Mexico City lawmakers proposed in 2024.
SOMOS stays very close to Movimiento Ciudadano and outdoes it on one point: it is the only party that calls in writing for adoption by same-sex couples, and it also wants abortion legal nationwide before 12 weeks. The PRI, by contrast, lands close to Morena and the PT on several questions: its declaration of principles says women should not be criminalized for exercising reproductive rights and that sexual diversity must not lead to discrimination, and in 2021 its leader leaned toward legalizing the marijuana trade, as the PT's did.
There are differences within the coalition too: on marijuana, the keenest to end prohibition is not Morena, which only proposes opening a debate, but the PVEM, whose platform calls for legalizing and regulating the drug market. PAZ, its positions still provisional, disagrees with legalizing abortion nationwide, and has a source for it: in a 2026 interview its legal representative granted that abortion is a right where the law recognizes it, but said the party will keep pushing pro-life initiatives.
The internet question brings the opposition back together: no party wants a government agency able to order content taken down. The PAN demands total freedom of expression, and the PRI, Movimiento Ciudadano and SOMOS also disagree; Morena, the PT and the PVEM stay in the middle, after the article allowing platforms to be blocked was struck from the 2025 telecommunications law. In absolute terms this theme has the most estimated positions, 18 of 48: five of PAZ's six, four of the PVEM's and three of the PT's. On euthanasia and on the rights of trans people, most parties have no text of their own.
Written from the documented positions of the eight parties on the questions in this issue; where part of it rests on estimated positions, that is stated. It does not include the answers of people taking the test.
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their electoral platforms, founding documents, votes in the Chamber of Deputies and public statements. The numbers refer to the questions below, each with its details and sources.
1. Abortion should be legal nationwide during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.
Each state regulates abortion in its criminal code: in some it is legal up to 12 weeks, in others only in cases such as rape. In 2023 the Supreme Court ruled that punishing it under the Federal Criminal Code is unconstitutional.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 5 in favor, 1 in between and 2 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | Strongly against | Programa de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), p. 8, punto 13 Why |
| PRI | In favor | Declaración de principios (2024), p. 12 Why |
| PVEM | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PT | In favor | Iniciativa de la diputada Ana Karina Rojo Pimentel (PT), Gaceta Parlamentaria, 9 de diciembre de 2025, p. 2 Why |
| MC | Strongly in favor | Programa de acción (2025), p. 8 Why |
| Morena | In favor | Programa de acción de morena (2024), p. 4; plataforma electoral 2024, p. 22 Why |
| PAZ | Against | Entrevista a Armando González Escoto en Animal Político, 15 de julio de 2026 Why |
| SOMOS | Strongly in favor | Programa de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 27 Why |
-
PAN Strongly againstPrograma de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), p. 8, punto 13 Why
-
PRI In favorDeclaración de principios (2024), p. 12 Why
-
PVEM In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PT In favorIniciativa de la diputada Ana Karina Rojo Pimentel (PT), Gaceta Parlamentaria, 9 de diciembre de 2025, p. 2 Why
-
MC Strongly in favorPrograma de acción (2025), p. 8 Why
-
Morena In favorPrograma de acción de morena (2024), p. 4; plataforma electoral 2024, p. 22 Why
-
PAZ AgainstEntrevista a Armando González Escoto en Animal Político, 15 de julio de 2026 Why
-
SOMOS Strongly in favorPrograma de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 27 Why
2. Same-sex couples should be able to adopt on the same terms as other couples.
Same-sex marriage is legal in all 32 states. Adoption is regulated by each state; the Supreme Court has ruled that denying it because of a couple's sexual orientation is discriminatory.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favor, 0 in between and 2 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | Against | Estimated position Why |
| PRI | In favor | Declaración de principios (2024), p. 21 Why |
| PVEM | In favor | Estimated position Why |
| PT | In favor | Estimated position Why |
| MC | In favor | Programa de acción (2025), pp. 5 y 8 Why |
| Morena | In favor | Plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 23-24 Why |
| PAZ | Against | Estimated position Why |
| SOMOS | Strongly in favor | Programa de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 29 Why |
-
PAN Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PRI In favorDeclaración de principios (2024), p. 21 Why
-
PVEM In favor
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PT In favor
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
MC In favorPrograma de acción (2025), pp. 5 y 8 Why
-
Morena In favorPlataforma electoral 2024, pp. 23-24 Why
-
PAZ Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS Strongly in favorPrograma de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 29 Why
3. The sale of marijuana for adult use should remain prohibited.
In 2021 the Supreme Court ruled that banning personal recreational use of marijuana, with a permit from Cofepris, is unconstitutional, but selling it remains illegal: no law regulates its sale.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favor, 1 in between and 5 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | In favor | Programa de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), p. 13, punto 44 Why |
| PRI | Against | Respuestas del dirigente nacional a Voto Informado 2021 (UNAM), p. 18 Why |
| PVEM | Strongly against | Plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 19 y 218 Why |
| PT | Against | Respuestas del dirigente nacional a Voto Informado 2021 (UNAM), p. 18 Why |
| MC | Strongly against | Plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 54 y 93 Why |
| Morena | In between | Plataforma electoral 2024, p. 39 Why |
| PAZ | In favor | Estimated position Why |
| SOMOS | Strongly against | Programa de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 64 Why |
-
PAN In favorPrograma de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), p. 13, punto 44 Why
-
PRI AgainstRespuestas del dirigente nacional a Voto Informado 2021 (UNAM), p. 18 Why
-
PVEM Strongly againstPlataforma electoral 2024, pp. 19 y 218 Why
-
PT AgainstRespuestas del dirigente nacional a Voto Informado 2021 (UNAM), p. 18 Why
-
MC Strongly againstPlataforma electoral 2024, pp. 54 y 93 Why
-
Morena In betweenPlataforma electoral 2024, p. 39 Why
-
PAZ In favor
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS Strongly againstPrograma de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), p. 64 Why
4. Trans people should be able to change their name and sex on their official documents through an administrative procedure.
In Mexico City and several states, a procedure at the civil registry is enough to change one's name and sex on the birth certificate; in others it requires going to court.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favor, 0 in between and 2 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | Against | Estimated position Why |
| PRI | In favor | Estimated position Why |
| PVEM | In favor | Estimated position Why |
| PT | In favor | Estimated position Why |
| MC | Strongly in favor | Plataforma electoral 2024, p. 102 Why |
| Morena | In favor | Plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 23-24 Why |
| PAZ | Against | Estimated position Why |
| SOMOS | In favor | Programa de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), pp. 29-30 Why |
-
PAN Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PRI In favor
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PVEM In favor
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PT In favor
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
MC Strongly in favorPlataforma electoral 2024, p. 102 Why
-
Morena In favorPlataforma electoral 2024, pp. 23-24 Why
-
PAZ Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS In favorPrograma de acción de SOMOS (registro de 2026), pp. 29-30 Why
5. Euthanasia should be legal for terminally ill patients who request it.
Euthanasia is a crime in Mexico. Mexico City and several states have advance directive laws, which allow patients to refuse treatment that only prolongs life, but not to ask for help to die.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favor, 4 in between and 2 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | Strongly against | Programa de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), p. 8, punto 13 Why |
| PRI | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PVEM | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PT | In between | Estimated position Why |
| MC | In favor | Xataka México, 8 de noviembre de 2024 Why |
| Morena | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PAZ | Against | Estimated position Why |
| SOMOS | In favor | Estimated position Why |
-
PAN Strongly againstPrograma de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), p. 8, punto 13 Why
-
PRI In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PVEM In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PT In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
MC In favorXataka México, 8 de noviembre de 2024 Why
-
Morena In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PAZ Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS In favor
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why
6. A government agency should be able to order internet platforms to remove harmful content.
Today platforms remove content mainly under their own rules or by court order. In July 2025 the Chamber passed a new Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law, which moves regulation of the sector to the federal government.
Of the 8 parties with a position on this question: 0 in favor, 4 in between and 4 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PAN | Strongly against | Programa de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), pp. 16 y 30, puntos 70 y 165 Why |
| PRI | Against | Plataforma electoral 2024, p. 84 Why |
| PVEM | In between | Votación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 1 de julio de 2025 (Ley en Materia de Telecomunicaciones y Radiodifusión) Why |
| PT | In between | Plataforma electoral 2024, pp. 14-15; respuestas del dirigente nacional a Voto Informado 2021 (UNAM), p. 19 Why |
| MC | Against | Declaración de principios (2025), pp. 3 y 7 Why |
| Morena | In between | Expansión Política, 8 de mayo de 2025; Publimetro, 9 de octubre de 2026 Why |
| PAZ | In between | Estimated position Why |
| SOMOS | Against | Boletín 52/2026 de SOMOS, 1 de octubre de 2026 Why |
-
PAN Strongly againstPrograma de acción del PAN (vigente desde 2023), pp. 16 y 30, puntos 70 y 165 Why
-
PRI AgainstPlataforma electoral 2024, p. 84 Why
-
PVEM In betweenVotación nominal en la Cámara de Diputados, 1 de julio de 2025 (Ley en Materia de Telecomunicaciones y Radiodifusión) Why
-
PT In betweenPlataforma electoral 2024, pp. 14-15; respuestas del dirigente nacional a Voto Informado 2021 (UNAM), p. 19 Why
-
MC AgainstDeclaración de principios (2025), pp. 3 y 7 Why
-
Morena In betweenExpansión Política, 8 de mayo de 2025; Publimetro, 9 de octubre de 2026 Why
-
PAZ In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s platform and statements as a whole, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SOMOS AgainstBoletín 52/2026 de SOMOS, 1 de octubre de 2026 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 1 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test