Skip to content

Party comparison

PAN vs PAZ: how alike are they?

We compare the documented positions of Partido Acción Nacional and Partido PAZ on the 45 questions in the test, issue by issue.

PAN
Center-right, political humanism
76 %
overall agreement
PAZ
Social conservatism, family values

In brief

How do PAN and PAZ differ?

Only 11 statements in the test have sources for both the PAN and the PAZ party, and on none of them do they take opposite sides. The base is narrow because PAZ was registered in June 2026, brings together leaders of the former Social Encounter Party (PES) and, until it presents its 2027 platform, has a documented position on only 12 of the 45 statements. The PAN, founded in 1939 and with a group in the Chamber, has one on 40.

The six agreements pit the PAN's votes and programs against PAZ's documents. Both want a judge to examine each case before ordering pretrial detention: the PAN voted in 2024 against widening the list of offenses that trigger it automatically, and PAZ asks to replace such measures by looking at each detainee's situation. Both defend autonomous bodies, the PAN more firmly (5 against 4) and with its 2024 vote against abolishing them; PAZ wants audit bodies to have their own budgets, plus effective competition laws. And both distrust centralized delivery of social programs: the PAN out of subsidiarity and to prevent patronage, PAZ because it wants community-built policy and a social program in each state.

On the environment PAZ goes a step further: it wants to tax the heaviest polluters progressively and spend the money on climate action (5), while the PAN's program asks for prices to reflect environmental costs, without naming specific taxes (4). On renewables they are level (4): the PAN plans to decarbonize electricity by 2030 without giving up gas, and PAZ offers tax incentives for clean technology. The sixth is abortion, with nuances: the PAN rejects it in its program (1), and PAZ's legal representative, Armando González Escoto, said in July 2026 that it must be respected wherever the law allows it, although the party will keep pushing initiatives to protect life (2).

On the other five, one of the two answers 3. The widest gap, two points, is on GM corn: the PAN group voted in 2025 against a constitutional ban (1), and PAZ wants its biosafety studied without asking for a ban or for approval (3). On social policy PAZ leans more toward universality, with a basic welfare floor for everyone (2), while the PAN mixes programs meant “above all” for the disadvantaged with its 2024 vote, in general terms, for universal ones (3). On pensions, PAZ wants to rebuild the system with national bonds without saying what happens to the Afores (3), and the PAN defends individual accounts (2). PAZ relies more on data analysis against crime (4 against 3), and the PAN on indigenous consultation with prior consent (4 against 3).

Left out of the count are 34 statements: 33 because of an estimated PAZ position, and the remaining one, guaranteed grain prices, because of an estimated PAN position, while PAZ does have a source (it asks for funds to balance the sale of staple goods). Five topics have not a single comparable statement: justice, elections, the economy, education and relations with the United States. So neither the judicial election nor the National Guard counts here, where the PAN has votes and PAZ only estimated positions.

PAZ has sources on five of the fifteen tiebreaker questions, and the PAN on four of those five. Two of them open a gap of two points or more. One is pacification: PAZ speaks of national reconciliation and alternative ways to commute sentences (4), and the PAN warns that peace cannot mean a State surrendering to crime, without proposing lighter sentences (2). The other is about taxes: PAZ wants progressive income tax rates on interest and dividends (5), and the PAN wants lower taxes and no levies on savings (2).

This summary is based on the parties’ documented positions on the test statements; the reasoning behind each position, and its source where there is one, is on each party’s page. Updated 25/10/2026.

Differences

Where they clash most

Economy and taxes

An annual tax on large fortunes should be created.

PAN Strongly against Why
PAZ In favor Estimated position Why

Common ground

Where they agree

Security and armed forces

Pretrial detention should always be decided by a judge, case by case, and not applied automatically depending on the offence.

Both: In favor

Work and pensions

The minimum wage should keep rising above inflation every year.

Both: In favor

Health and social programs

The sale of vapes and e-cigarettes should be banned.

Both: In between

Health and social programs

Social programs should be delivered through states and municipalities, not only directly by the federal government.

Both: In favor

Education, children and family

Full-day schools in basic education should be brought back.

Both: In favor

Education, children and family

Under-16s should not be able to open social media accounts without verified permission from a parent or guardian.

Both: In favor

By issue

Agreement by issue

Detail

Question by question

Security and armed forces 75 %
Question PAN PAZ
The National Guard should return to civilian command, outside the Ministry of Defense. Strongly in favor In between
Pretrial detention should always be decided by a judge, case by case, and not applied automatically depending on the offence. In favor In favor
The armed forces should stop running airports, trains and customs. In favor In between
The government should use facial recognition cameras and artificial intelligence to prevent crime. In between In favor
Justice and the judiciary 58 %
Question PAN PAZ
The election of judges, magistrates and Supreme Court justices by popular vote should be reversed. Strongly in favor In between
The suspensions that judges grant in amparo proceedings against laws and government acts should be limited. Strongly against In between
Constitutional amendments should not be open to challenge before the Supreme Court. Strongly against Against
Elections and parties 69 %
Question PAN PAZ
Proportional-representation deputies should be chosen by direct vote, not from lists drawn up by the parties. In favor In between
Public funding for political parties should be cut. Against In between
No party should hold a larger share of seats in the Chamber than its share of the vote. Strongly in favor In favor
Only people who hold Mexican nationality alone should be able to govern a state or the country. Strongly against In between
Institutions and corruption 75 %
Question PAN PAZ
Autonomous bodies, independent from the government, should be restored for transparency and economic competition. Strongly in favor In favor
The ban on relatives succeeding an officeholder should already apply in the 2027 elections, not from 2030. In favor In between
Deputies and senators should not have immunity: prosecutors should be able to take them before a judge without the Chamber's permission. Strongly in favor In favor
Economy and taxes 58 %
Question PAN PAZ
An annual tax on large fortunes should be created. Strongly against In favor
Taxes on soft drinks, junk food and tobacco should be raised. Against In between
The government should reduce public debt even if that forces it to spend less. In favor In between
Work and pensions 88 %
Question PAN PAZ
The private retirement-fund system (Afores) should be replaced by a public pension system. Against In between
The minimum wage should keep rising above inflation every year. In favor In favor
Health and social programs 85 %
Question PAN PAZ
Social programs should be aimed mainly at those who have least, rather than being for everyone. In between Against
People without social security should be able to get care at private clinics paid for by the State when the public system cannot give them an appointment or medicines. In favor In between
The sale of vapes and e-cigarettes should be banned. In between In between
The federal government should buy and distribute the medicines for all public health institutions. In favor In between
Social programs should be delivered through states and municipalities, not only directly by the federal government. In favor In favor
Education, children and family 92 %
Question PAN PAZ
Teachers should have to pass an evaluation to obtain and keep their posts. Strongly in favor In favor
Full-day schools in basic education should be brought back. In favor In favor
Under-16s should not be able to open social media accounts without verified permission from a parent or guardian. In favor In favor
Energy and environment 80 %
Question PAN PAZ
Private companies should be able to compete with Pemex and the CFE (the state oil and electricity companies) on equal terms. Strongly in favor In favor
Mexico should allow fracking to produce more of its own gas. In favor In between
Polluters should pay environmental taxes according to the damage they cause. In favor Strongly in favor
Mexico should prioritize renewable energy over oil and gas, even if it costs more at first. In favor In favor
No new mining concessions should be granted. Against In between
Water, farming and indigenous peoples 63 %
Question PAN PAZ
Planting genetically modified maize should remain banned in Mexico. Strongly against In between
Holders of a water concession should be able to sell it or pass it on together with the land. Strongly in favor In between
A project on indigenous land should not go ahead if the community rejects it in the consultation. In favor In between
Prices for staple grains should be set by the market, without government guaranteed prices. In between Against
United States, trade and migration 83 %
Question PAN PAZ
Mexico should keep high tariffs on products from China and other countries that have no trade agreement with it. In between In between
Mexico should prioritize its relationship with the United States and Canada over its relationship with Latin America. In favor In between
Mexico should stop undocumented migrants from crossing the country on their way to the United States. Against In between
Rights and freedoms 83 %
Question PAN PAZ
Abortion should be legal nationwide during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. Strongly against Against
Same-sex couples should be able to adopt on the same terms as other couples. Against Against
The sale of marijuana for adult use should remain prohibited. In favor In favor
Trans people should be able to change their name and sex on their official documents through an administrative procedure. Against Against
Euthanasia should be legal for terminally ill patients who request it. Strongly against Against
A government agency should be able to order internet platforms to remove harmful content. Strongly against In between

What about you? Which of the two do you agree with more?

Take the test and find out how closely you match PAN, PAZ and the other parties.

Take the political test